Portal de Totana
www.portaldetotana.com
I am still waiting for someone to explain the reason why the PSOE is not going to explain the solution to the heights proposed by the PP in the last plenary, showing that they both agree (PP and PSOE) in the model heights.
It also looks like those who are called "We Can" in Totana have the same opinion.
I would like to know what opinion will Errejón, Pablo Iglesias, Ada Colau or Manuela Carmena, on Urban Planning in Old Towns like that of Totana and model of Heights and General Public Systems.
But the (National) leaders of Podemos are in other debates more transcendental than the General Plan of Totana.
Is it possible that the problem of the General Plan is not the Heights?
Since 2013, who have risen from the work table of the Plan, the PSOE, together with the President of Cebag, I think they have had more than enough time to present and present the alternative.
To the heights and to the General Plan.
They have it?
What do the experts consulted say?
Do paddle fields in the channel of the Rambla as it points the "brilliant urbanist, Mandela"?
Public or private for that DNA?
In a recent meeting with the Director of Urbanism and Housing, the councilor of the PSOE, showed that "in Totana there were 5 parties and that We could Totana was a split from Ganar Totana and was not in agreement with the Plan ..." Le He failed to comment that the Mayor does not want anyone in We can not in IU or have a survey that gives 12 councilors to the PP.
Faced with my strangeness it only remained to me to say that the last political divisions that I know in Totana had been in the PSOE and that did not understand that "argument" in a table with the present General Director.
Especially when the "We can split" in Totana have been supporting the PSOE for years.
Even in the function of "star signings" for the lists or practicing of Ventrilocuo in the strategy meetings.
But speaking of harmed by the heights, it looks like the "Battle Horse" of some.
Worth an example of the thousands that are in the urban area of ​​Totana.
People who have recently built their home in areas where they would go 3 heights and attic, according to the vision of PSOE, We can, CEBAG or the Carthaginian.
In an example: If a family has built a house on a ground floor and the land is listed for 3 heights and attic, it turns out that in more than 100 years, that house is not going to be modified.
Like thousands of homes in neighborhoods like Ramblica, Cheap Houses, Tirol Camilleri, Las Peras, Era Alta ... And a few in the Center.
Those houses with ground or duplex, if approved the heights that defend PP, PSOE or "We can Totana", will pay more contribution (IBI) once the cadastral values ​​are updated.
For what reason?
Well simply because the IBI (Urban Contribution) is calculated on two elements: Construction and solar.
The value of the construction will be the same.
But the land, by its use, is much more expensive if they can be built on 4 heights.
If you can build 1 or 2, the receipt will be cheaper.
Are all these neighborhoods going to demolish their homes immediately to build 3 floors and attic?
Please do not play with the intelligence of the citizens.
Are the problem the heights?
Give it to me, no.
Solutions?
They could think of a new urbanism, reducing the absurd.
As in restaurants: "A la Carte".
Do you want 5 heights?
Then get 5 heights.
No problem Does the next one want low and one?
Well low and one.
Do you have in the Sierra 10,000 meters?
Then divide into 2500 (or less) and sell 4 plots to do what you want.
Then, that the City Council takes the public services and such.
Pay the people who is not nobody in particular.
With that method, all happy.
Even the Carthaginian could make 7 heights to give the sun and street the "fine print."
That you have a plot in the Pernegueras and want to do 5 heights?
Well, 5 heights and so stop denying.
On one occasion, years ago (Over 2000), a councilor gave me the solution to Totana's economy and to Urbanism: "Camposol Model".
"Thanks to the licensing of works in Camposol, Mazarrón City Hall officials collect their payroll every month ..." Not long ago (15 years later), deputies from the same party, they denounced on the spot the consequences of that "model" So exemplary in other times.
Juan José Cánovas
Source: @jjcanovas
Privacy policy
- Legal notice
- Cookies