Portal de Totana

www.portaldetotana.com

Totana - SpanishTotana - English
detail of Totana

 

The PP analyzes in depth the propagandistic "audit" presented by the Government Team to justify the brutal rise of taxes and its lies in electoral campaign (17/11/2016)

The Popular Party further analyzes the economic-financial study presented by the Government Team of Totana City Council, for which € 20,000 (€ 6,400 / month) has been paid in breach of the mandate of the plenary where it was agreed that it should be done by Of the Technical Services Municipale, which was approved unanimously by all political groups.

1- The report entitled "Analysis economic-financial situation" is not a financial audit as we have wanted to sell from the Government Team and what was requested by the Municipal People's Party in the motion presented at the September plenary session 2015. What's the difference?

A financial audit consists of the examination and evaluation of an entity's financial statements to express an opinion on whether these financial statements reflect the true and fair view of the entity's equity.

While the work carried out by the consultant ACAL is not governed by any law or under the accounting principles that governs the General Accounting Plan (PGC) in force.

Both Andrés García and the finance council insist that this is an audit, while the reality is that it is a mere report made by a consultant at the customer's will, in this case the Mayor of Totana and his partner in government .

1ª CONCLUSION: THE GOVERNMENT TEAM LIEES TO REITERATE THAT IT IS AN AUDIT.

2- An audit firm is a fully independent entity governed by the Audit Act and its work must comply with the law and respect the PGC while the report made by ACAL is totally biased and is made ad hoc (especially made For a specific purpose or intended for a specific situation), with a marked political character and lack of objectivity.

The aim is to show a situation of extreme gravity that serves as a refuge for the poor management of the Mayor and his team, as well as to endorse the lies expressed by the PSOE during the election campaign.

The report is the result of a contractual relationship by which the Mayor directly hires the consultant to help and assist, which is what the consultants do.

We repeat that the consultants do not audit.

If the Mayor had wanted to show the real image of the City's debt situation, he would not have hired a consultant but an audit or would have fulfilled the full agreement in which he urged municipal officials to carry it out with the help of the General Intervention Of the State.

2nd CONCLUSION: NOT AN AUDIT, IS A CONSULTATION.

CONSULTANTS DO NOT AUDIT.

3- Return to LIE, when they believe that the debt of the City of Totana is situated at 180 million euros.

Assuming that the figures are not audited.

According to what appears from the "economic-financial report", the debt does not stand at 180 million for the following:

Both the Report, and the Mayor, as Andrés García and the councilman include possible contingencies as debt, ERROR.

The report puts a figure of less than 20 million euros in "Economic contingencies not yet in force" and include them as debt.

According to the report, they are "economic contingencies due to procedures that have not yet materialized" and "possible economic claims that may arise from the return of the income received from urban development agreements."

That is, the report recognizes as debt the money received by approved urban development agreements that have not even been claimed by anyone.

According to the PGC, contingencies are not debt, but are understood as the probability of certain adverse events occurring and will be included in the annual financial statements independently, and not as an explanation of provisions (liabilities) and value adjustments.

It is therefore a HANDLING of the data.

3 ° CONCLUSION: THE NUMBERS ARE MANIPULATED TO QUADRATE THE LIES.

For more information and continuing the line of manipulation adopted by the Mayor and Andrés García, also add another almost 40 million euros in the debt sack.

These 38,696,026 euros are derived, as detailed in the economic and financial report, from future accrued interest on loans signed by the City of Totana.

ERROR.

This debt recognition completely violates the accrual basis of accounting, which says that economic transactions or facts will be recorded at the time they occur.

In short, according to this principle and pure logic can not be recognized as current debt the interest that will accrue in the years to come.

A clear example of the manipulative purpose of the work commissioned by the Mayor and his team.

4 ° CONCLUSION: MANIPULATIVE PURPOSE OF WORK ORDER.

4- As a sample of the political and subjective nature of this report, a comparison is made between the debt registered before the beginning of the legislature and that registered with the new government team.

From this analysis it follows that:

The current Mayor and government team have generated more than 8 million euros of debt in only 6 months, at a rate of 1,379,790 euros of debt per month.

On the other hand, and starting from the fact that the City had a debt of 8 million euros (according to the tonnage signed by Alfonso Martínez Baños and Juan Morales) before the Popular Party entered in 2003, the growth rate of the Debt under the popular party government is almost half that of the current government team, at the rate of 730,888 euros per month.

Explanation: According to this table, during the period of government of the PP (12 years, 144 months) a total of 105,247,864 euros had been generated (113,247,864 less the 8 million that already existed of debt in 2003 in the signature of the tonnage Although the real debt was more than 20 million euros, recalling in this section the screen companies that created the Covenant Team).

If we divide the 105 million between the 144 months of government of the PP we get a debt of 730.888 euros per month.

5th CONCLUSION: THE MAYOR AND ITS TEAM INCREASE THE DEBT GROWTH RATE BY 89% SINCE I ARRIVED TO THE CITY COUNCIL.

The Popular Party denounces that the presentation of this tailor made analysis is done as a smokescreen to justify the brutal rise of taxes and fees in the face of the inability to manifestly manage this equipment of the pact of distribution of armchairs and payrolls.

Source: PP Totana

Notice
UNE-EN ISO 9001:2000 - ER-0131/2006 Región de Murcia
© 2024 Alamo Networks S.L. - C/Alamo 8, 30850 Totana (Murcia) Privacy policy - Legal notice - Cookies
Utilizamos cookies propias y de terceros para facilitar su navegación en la página web, conocer cómo interactúas con nosotros y recopilar datos estadísticos. Por favor, lee nuestra Política de Cookies para conocer con mayor detalle las cookies que usamos, su finalidad y como poder configurarlas o rechazarlas, si así lo considera.